| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
|
Data corrente: |
28/09/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
28/09/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
PUNTEL, L. A.; BOLFE, E. L.; MELCHIORI, R. J. M.; ORTEGA, R.; TISCORNIA, G.; ROEL, A.; SCARAMUZZA, F.; BEST, S.; BERGER, A. G.; HANSEL, D. S. S.; DURÁN, D. P.; BALBOA, G. R. |
|
Afiliação: |
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA; EDSON LUIS BOLFE, CNPTIA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS; INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGÍA AGROPECUARIA EEA; UNIVERSIDAD TÉCNICA FEDERICO SANTA MARÍA; INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA; INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA, TREINTA Y TRES; INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGÍA AGROPECUARIA EEA; INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES AGROPECUARIAS, QUILAMAPU; INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA, LA ESTANZUELA; CORTEVA AGRISCIENCE; MODAG, COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS AGRONÓMOS, SANTIAGO; UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA. |
|
Título: |
How digital is agriculture in a subset of countries from South America? Adoption and limitations. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Crop & Pasture Science, 2022. |
|
Páginas: |
18 p. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1071/CP21759 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Special issue. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract. Digital agriculture (DA) can contribute solutions to meet an increase in healthy, nutritious, and affordable food demands in an efficient and sustainable way. South America (SA) is one of the main grain and protein producers in the world but the status of DA in the region is unknown. A systematic review and case studies from Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile were conducted to address the following objectives: (1) quantify adoption of existing DA technologies, (2) identify limitations for DA adoption; and (3) summarise existing metrics to benchmark DA benefits. Level of DA adoption was led by Brazil and Argentina followed by Uruguay and at a slower rate, Chile. GPS guidance systems, mapping tools, mobile apps and remote sensing were the most adopted DA technologies in SA. The most reported limitations to adoption were technology cost, lack of training, limited number of companies providing services, and unclear benefits from DA. Across the case studies, there was no clear definition of DA. To mitigate some of these limitations, our findings suggest the need for a DA educational curriculum that can fulfill the demand for job skills such as data processing, analysis and interpretation. Regional efforts are needed to standardise these metrics. This will allow stakeholders to design targeted initiatives to promote DA towards sustainability of food production in the region. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Adoção de tecnologia; Agricultura digital; América do Sul; Desenvolvimento regional; Digital agriculture; Digital technologies; Internet das coisas; IoT; Regional development; Sustainability; Sustentabilidade; Technology adoption; Tecnologias digitais. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
South America. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1146906/1/AP-How-digital-CSIRO-2022.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02690naa a2200457 a 4500
001 2146906
005 2022-09-28
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1071/CP21759$2DOI
100 1 $aPUNTEL, L. A.
245 $aHow digital is agriculture in a subset of countries from South America? Adoption and limitations.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
300 $a18 p.
500 $aSpecial issue.
520 $aAbstract. Digital agriculture (DA) can contribute solutions to meet an increase in healthy, nutritious, and affordable food demands in an efficient and sustainable way. South America (SA) is one of the main grain and protein producers in the world but the status of DA in the region is unknown. A systematic review and case studies from Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile were conducted to address the following objectives: (1) quantify adoption of existing DA technologies, (2) identify limitations for DA adoption; and (3) summarise existing metrics to benchmark DA benefits. Level of DA adoption was led by Brazil and Argentina followed by Uruguay and at a slower rate, Chile. GPS guidance systems, mapping tools, mobile apps and remote sensing were the most adopted DA technologies in SA. The most reported limitations to adoption were technology cost, lack of training, limited number of companies providing services, and unclear benefits from DA. Across the case studies, there was no clear definition of DA. To mitigate some of these limitations, our findings suggest the need for a DA educational curriculum that can fulfill the demand for job skills such as data processing, analysis and interpretation. Regional efforts are needed to standardise these metrics. This will allow stakeholders to design targeted initiatives to promote DA towards sustainability of food production in the region.
650 $aSouth America
653 $aAdoção de tecnologia
653 $aAgricultura digital
653 $aAmérica do Sul
653 $aDesenvolvimento regional
653 $aDigital agriculture
653 $aDigital technologies
653 $aInternet das coisas
653 $aIoT
653 $aRegional development
653 $aSustainability
653 $aSustentabilidade
653 $aTechnology adoption
653 $aTecnologias digitais
700 1 $aBOLFE, E. L.
700 1 $aMELCHIORI, R. J. M.
700 1 $aORTEGA, R.
700 1 $aTISCORNIA, G.
700 1 $aROEL, A.
700 1 $aSCARAMUZZA, F.
700 1 $aBEST, S.
700 1 $aBERGER, A. G.
700 1 $aHANSEL, D. S. S.
700 1 $aDURÁN, D. P.
700 1 $aBALBOA, G. R.
773 $tCrop & Pasture Science, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
27/01/2011 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
30/03/2023 |
|
Autoria: |
FERNANDES, F. L.; PICANÇO, M. C.; CHEDIAK, M.; FERNANDES, M. E. S.; RAMOS, R. S.; MOREIRA, S. de S. |
|
Afiliação: |
Flávio Lemes Fernandes, Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV); Marcelo Coutinho Picanço, UFV, Departamento de Biologia Animal; Mateus Chediak, UFV, Departamento de Biologia Animal; Maria Elisa Sena Fernandes, UFV, Departamento de Biologia Geral; Rodrigo Soares Ramos, UFV, Departamento de Biologia Animal; Suzana de Sá Moreira, UFV, Departamento de Biologia Animal. |
|
Título: |
A low-cost trap for Cerambycidae monitoring in forest plantations in Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2010 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 45, n. 9, p. 1044-1047, set. 2010 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Notas Científicas.
Título em português: Armadilha de baixo custo para monitoramento de Cerambycidae em plantações florestais no Brasil. |
|
Conteúdo: |
The objective of this work was to evaluate the use of a low-cost trap to capture Cerambycidae in different seasons in planted forests in Brazil. Thirty polyethylene-terephthalate trap bottles per hectare were used, disposed at every 50 m. The traps were red painted and contained glass flasks with a mixture of ethanol, methanol and benzaldehyde. There were soap and water at the trap bottom. The traps were checked biweekly for beetle presence. Sampling time required one minute per sample, and traps were easy to use. Total sampling cost, including materials and labor, was US$ 13.46 per sample. Six Cerambycidae species were captured along the dry and rainy seasons. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Broca de madeira; Custo de amostragem; Manejo integrado de pragas; Monitoramento de pragas; Sampling cost; Wood borer. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
integrated pest management; pest monitoring. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/105674/1/A-low8209cost.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01681naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1874719
005 2023-03-30
008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aFERNANDES, F. L.
245 $aA low-cost trap for Cerambycidae monitoring in forest plantations in Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2010
500 $aNotas Científicas. Título em português: Armadilha de baixo custo para monitoramento de Cerambycidae em plantações florestais no Brasil.
520 $aThe objective of this work was to evaluate the use of a low-cost trap to capture Cerambycidae in different seasons in planted forests in Brazil. Thirty polyethylene-terephthalate trap bottles per hectare were used, disposed at every 50 m. The traps were red painted and contained glass flasks with a mixture of ethanol, methanol and benzaldehyde. There were soap and water at the trap bottom. The traps were checked biweekly for beetle presence. Sampling time required one minute per sample, and traps were easy to use. Total sampling cost, including materials and labor, was US$ 13.46 per sample. Six Cerambycidae species were captured along the dry and rainy seasons.
650 $aintegrated pest management
650 $apest monitoring
653 $aBroca de madeira
653 $aCusto de amostragem
653 $aManejo integrado de pragas
653 $aMonitoramento de pragas
653 $aSampling cost
653 $aWood borer
700 1 $aPICANÇO, M. C.
700 1 $aCHEDIAK, M.
700 1 $aFERNANDES, M. E. S.
700 1 $aRAMOS, R. S.
700 1 $aMOREIRA, S. de S.
773 $tPesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF$gv. 45, n. 9, p. 1044-1047, set. 2010
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais (AI-SEDE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
